 | |  | |  | |  | |  |
| The Atlantic Affairs Security. Ideologies. Multiculturalism. |
| I N S I G H T -------- Choosing Death ASH Smyth Fatal Britain Civitas Report Russians at Edge Liliana N. P. Chavez's Mutiny Chloe Saimpert Clout of Islam Sadanand Dhume Host Country Sabina Ahmed Google Vs. US Amy Peikoff |
The fear to speak comes to America's shores
By Onkar Ghate
Posted: April 6, 2006
Europeans are all too well acquainted with the fear of criticizing Islam.
To cite just a few of depressingly many examples: a painter, Rashid
Ben Ali, is forced into hiding after one of his shows "featured satirical
work critical of Islamic militant's violence"; a politician, Ayaan Hirsi Ali,
must go underground after it becomes known that she has renounced
her Islamic faith; and a film director, Theo van Gogh, is savagely
stabbed to death for making a film critical of Islamic oppression of
women.
And most recently, of course, there were the Danish cartoons. When
the Jyllands-Posten, in order to expose and challenge this climate of
intimidation, printed an article and accompanying cartoons, some of
which portrayed Mohammed in a negative light, the response was
torched embassies, cries for government censorship, and death threats.
It appears that we should now begin to get used to a similar climate in
America.
Borders and Waldenbooks stores have just announced that they will
not stock the April-May issue of Free Inquiry magazine because the
issue reprints some of the cartoons. Is the decision based on
disagreement with the content of the magazine? No, not according to
Borders Group Inc. spokeswoman Beth Bingham. "For us, the safety
and security of our customers and employees is a top priority, and we
believe that carrying this issue could challenge that priority."
Borders Group's capitulation to Islamic thugs is understandable given
the pathetic response of our and other Western governments.
Has any Western government declared that an individual's freedom of
speech is sacrosanct, no matter who screams offense at his ideas?
No. Has any Western government proclaimed each individual's right to
life and pledged to hunt down anyone, anywhere, who abets the
murder of one of its citizens for having had the effrontery to speak?
No-- as they did not when the fatwa against Rushdie was issued,
American bookstores were firebombed, and Rushdie's translators
were attacked and murdered.
On the contrary, our government went out of its way to say that it
shares "the offence that Muslims have taken at these images," and
even hinted that they should not be published. The British police,
Douglas Murray reports, told the editor of a London magazine that they
could not protect him, his staff, or his offices from attack--so the
magazine removed the cartoons from its website. (A few days later,
Murray notes, "the police provided 500 officers to protect a 'peaceful'
Muslim protest in Trafalgar Square.")
In the face of such outrages, we must demand that the US
government reverse its disgraceful stand and fulfill is obligation to
protect our right to free speech.
Freedom of speech means the right to express one's ideas without
danger of physical coercion from anyone. This freedom includes the
right to make movies, write books, draw pictures, voice political
opinions -- and satirize religion. This right flows from the right to think:
the right to observe, to follow the evidence, to reach the conclusions
you judge the facts warrant--and then to convey your thoughts to others.
In a free society, anyone angered by someone else's ideas has a
simple and powerful recourse: don't buy his books, watch his movies,
or read his newspapers. If one judges his ideas dangerous, argue
against them. The purveyor of evil ideas is no threat to those who
remain free to counter them with rational ones.
But the moment someone decides to answer those he finds offensive
with a knife or a homemade explosive, not an argument, he removes
himself from civilized society.
Against such a threat to our rights, our government must respond with
force. If it fails to do so, it fails to fulfill its reason for being: "to secure
these rights," Jefferson wrote, "Governments are instituted among
Men." And if it fails to do so, we the people must hold it to account.
We must vociferously demand that our government declare publicly
that, from this day forward, it will defend by force any American who
receives death threats for criticizing Islam-- or religion-- or any other
idea. We must demand that the government protect the stores and
employees of Borders, of Waldenbooks, and of any other organization
that reprints the cartoons.
We must demand this, because nothing less will prevent America's
climate of freedom from disintegrating into Europe's climate of fear.
### ### ###
Onkar Ghate is a senior fellow at the Ayn Rand Institute in Irvine,
California. He can be reached via www.aynrand.org
By Onkar Ghate
Posted: April 6, 2006
Europeans are all too well acquainted with the fear of criticizing Islam.
To cite just a few of depressingly many examples: a painter, Rashid
Ben Ali, is forced into hiding after one of his shows "featured satirical
work critical of Islamic militant's violence"; a politician, Ayaan Hirsi Ali,
must go underground after it becomes known that she has renounced
her Islamic faith; and a film director, Theo van Gogh, is savagely
stabbed to death for making a film critical of Islamic oppression of
women.
And most recently, of course, there were the Danish cartoons. When
the Jyllands-Posten, in order to expose and challenge this climate of
intimidation, printed an article and accompanying cartoons, some of
which portrayed Mohammed in a negative light, the response was
torched embassies, cries for government censorship, and death threats.
It appears that we should now begin to get used to a similar climate in
America.
Borders and Waldenbooks stores have just announced that they will
not stock the April-May issue of Free Inquiry magazine because the
issue reprints some of the cartoons. Is the decision based on
disagreement with the content of the magazine? No, not according to
Borders Group Inc. spokeswoman Beth Bingham. "For us, the safety
and security of our customers and employees is a top priority, and we
believe that carrying this issue could challenge that priority."
Borders Group's capitulation to Islamic thugs is understandable given
the pathetic response of our and other Western governments.
Has any Western government declared that an individual's freedom of
speech is sacrosanct, no matter who screams offense at his ideas?
No. Has any Western government proclaimed each individual's right to
life and pledged to hunt down anyone, anywhere, who abets the
murder of one of its citizens for having had the effrontery to speak?
No-- as they did not when the fatwa against Rushdie was issued,
American bookstores were firebombed, and Rushdie's translators
were attacked and murdered.
On the contrary, our government went out of its way to say that it
shares "the offence that Muslims have taken at these images," and
even hinted that they should not be published. The British police,
Douglas Murray reports, told the editor of a London magazine that they
could not protect him, his staff, or his offices from attack--so the
magazine removed the cartoons from its website. (A few days later,
Murray notes, "the police provided 500 officers to protect a 'peaceful'
Muslim protest in Trafalgar Square.")
In the face of such outrages, we must demand that the US
government reverse its disgraceful stand and fulfill is obligation to
protect our right to free speech.
Freedom of speech means the right to express one's ideas without
danger of physical coercion from anyone. This freedom includes the
right to make movies, write books, draw pictures, voice political
opinions -- and satirize religion. This right flows from the right to think:
the right to observe, to follow the evidence, to reach the conclusions
you judge the facts warrant--and then to convey your thoughts to others.
In a free society, anyone angered by someone else's ideas has a
simple and powerful recourse: don't buy his books, watch his movies,
or read his newspapers. If one judges his ideas dangerous, argue
against them. The purveyor of evil ideas is no threat to those who
remain free to counter them with rational ones.
But the moment someone decides to answer those he finds offensive
with a knife or a homemade explosive, not an argument, he removes
himself from civilized society.
Against such a threat to our rights, our government must respond with
force. If it fails to do so, it fails to fulfill its reason for being: "to secure
these rights," Jefferson wrote, "Governments are instituted among
Men." And if it fails to do so, we the people must hold it to account.
We must vociferously demand that our government declare publicly
that, from this day forward, it will defend by force any American who
receives death threats for criticizing Islam-- or religion-- or any other
idea. We must demand that the government protect the stores and
employees of Borders, of Waldenbooks, and of any other organization
that reprints the cartoons.
We must demand this, because nothing less will prevent America's
climate of freedom from disintegrating into Europe's climate of fear.
### ### ###
Onkar Ghate is a senior fellow at the Ayn Rand Institute in Irvine,
California. He can be reached via www.aynrand.org
| (c) 2006 New Criterion Foundation, London |